Centerville City Hall
250 N. Main Street
Centerville, UT 84014
(801) 292-8034 fax
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Monday - Friday
April 21, 2015
Minutes of the Centerville City Council meeting held Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 7:05 p.m. in the Centerville City Hall Council Chambers, 250 North Main Street, Centerville, Utah.
Mayor Paul A. Cutler
Council Members Ken S. Averett
STAFF PRESENT Cory Snyder, Community Development Director
STAFF ABSENT Steve Thacker, City Manager
VISITORS Nathan Peterson, UDOT Project Manager
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
PRAYER OR THOUGHT Mayor Paul Cutler
No one wished to comment.
MINUTES REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE
The minutes of the April 7, 2015 Council meeting were reviewed. Lisa Romney, City Attorney, requested an amendment. Councilman Averett made a motion to approve the minutes as amended. Councilman Higginson seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).
PRESENTATION REGARDING SOUTH DAVIS I-15 PROJECT
Nathan Peterson, UDOT Project Manager for the South Davis I-15 Project, updated the Council on the Project, and showed a simulation video to demonstrate movements through the interchanges that have been redesigned. Construction of the pedestrian bridge at Parrish Lane is expected to be completed this summer; however, construction of the sidewalk on the east side of the bridge is not included in the current contract. Mr. Peterson said he anticipates the sidewalk will be completed by the end of the year. Mr. Peterson and Councilwoman Fillmore reported on the earth-tone color scheme selected for the pedestrian bridge. Mr. Peterson updated the Council on the status of drainage culvert projects at Lund Lane and Chase Lane.
QUESTAR FRANCHISE RENEWAL
Ms. Romney reported that Questar has paid the application fee and signed the renewal Franchise Agreement. Councilwoman Fillmore made amotion to adopt Ordinance No. 2015-06 granting to Questar Gas Company a Franchise for the construction, operation, and maintenance of a Gas Distribution System in Centerville City. Councilwoman Ivie seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).
WHITAKER MUSEUM SIGN
Spencer Packer, Whitaker Museum Board Chair, provided drawings of the proposed sign for the Whitaker Museum. The Board previously allocated $6,000 for the sign in the Museum Budget. The Rotary Club has donated an additional $2,000. The Whitaker Board has received preliminary bids and learned that approximately $4,000 more will be needed to complete the project. Chair Packer said the Board is asking the Council for the full amount at this time, which could potentially be offset by City department labor or in-kind donations. Staff suggested the amount come from General Fund balance if the Council wants to provide this additional funding.
Councilman Wright made a motion to approve allocation of up to $4,000 from General Fund balance for the Whitaker Museum sign. Councilwoman Ivie seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).
TEMPORARY ZONING REGULATIONS FOR SOUTH MAIN STREET CORRIDOR ZONE – CONSIDER ORDINANCE NO. 2015-05
At the April 7, 2015 City Council meeting the Council directed staff to research initiating a Temporary Zoning Regulation Ordinance (TZRO) to take a closer look at the South Main Street Corridor Plan. Staff provided a sample ordinance as well as a memorandum addressing legal issues regarding the TZRO. Mr. Snyder explained that since the last Council meeting, Brighton Homes has submitted an application for conceptual site plan approval, in accordance with current zoning ordinances, that includes 50 units on the property between 300 South and Porter Lane on Main Street. A TZRO would prevent future applications for up to six months. Mr. Snyder explained that site plan applications – whether permitted or conditional use – are handled by the Planning Commission for review and approval. He said he suspects the existing application may eventually include subdivision of land, which would be presented to the Council on recommendation from the Planning Commission. Mr. Snyder stated that from his perspective a TZRO would close the door to negotiations regarding the existing application.
Councilman Wright stated he believes there is nothing the Council can do about the existing application. He is concerned about the rest of the corridor, and he said he thinks it would be good to have a TZRO to engage the residents and property owners regarding what needs to be in place. Councilman Wright added that the process does not need to take six months. Councilwoman Fillmore stated that although there is possibly a need and willingness to talk more about the Main Street Plan and make changes as needed, the vocalization of concern was spurred by the specific project. She said she feels a TZRO would likely hinder the ability to help the existing project happen in a better way with a better end result. The existing application is quite different from what was first proposed, which Councilwoman Fillmore said she feels is a result of a lack of negotiation. She suggested the City negotiate for the best possible outcome of the current project under the existing legal constraints, and continue discussing changes needed for the Main Street Plan, with the possibility of placing a TZRO in the future if needed.
Councilwoman Ivie expressed frustration that the City got this far without realizing that the South Main Street Corridor Plan allows the proposed density. Councilwoman Ivie listed potential problems with the options available, and stated she does not see a clear answer to the problem. Mr. Snyder briefly described the existing application. Mayor Cutler stated he feels there is a better chance of influencing density and design of the project by not imposing a TZRO at this time. Councilman Wright asked if the City could negotiate with the current project and implement a TZRO to look at the rest of Main Street simultaneously. Councilwoman Ivie agreed with Councilman Wright that the TZRO would not need to be a long drawn-out process and repeated his question. Ms. Romney responded that the submitted application for site plan approval will be considered by the Planning Commission and will not come before the Council. Negotiations could occur with a TZRO in place, but the TZRO would have to be repealed in order to consider a text amendment or rezone. Councilwoman Fillmore stated she thinks doing both would send mixed messages. She repeated her suggestion that the City continue negotiations to hopefully improve the existing project, and save the TZRO for a later time if needed. Councilman Higginson said he feels a TZRO would send a message that the City is not interested in working something out that is beneficial to the developer and the citizens. Council members Ivie and Averett expressed disappointment that Brighton Homes submitted the current application. Councilman Averett agreed with a comment made by Councilman Higginson during the work session that the time for a TZRO has passed, and said he does not think there is an imminent threat of another application in the near future.
Councilman Higginson stated he hopes the developer will see the decision to not implement a TZRO as an opportunity to work out something good for the community. Councilman Wright stressed the need to make necessary changes to the South Main Street Corridor Plan quickly. Councilwoman Fillmore pointed out that it is easy to state what is not wanted, and asked the public to be thoughtful about what development would be desirable.
Councilman Averett asked Mr. Snyder if he thinks additional applications are imminent, how quickly an evaluation of the Plan could take place, and if hiring additional consultants would be helpful. Mr. Snyder responded there are properties with potential for redevelopment, but he does not expect anything in the next six months. The existing project may generate interest if it is successful. The length of time needed for an evaluation will depend on the priority assigned by the Council. Hiring a consultant specializing in the economics and market conditions of redevelopment would be helpful. Referring to comments made in the April 7th meeting that commercial is no longer viable on Main Street, Mr. Snyder stated that removing commercial would have economic impacts on the City as well as the property owners. He said he is not sure that commercial is not viable. Responding to the concern regarding density, Mr. Snyder said that a development of single-family homes on Main Street may not work economically. Councilwoman Fillmore pointed out that single-family development is already an available use, and would have already happened if it were viable. Councilman Averett said he feels it would be worth the time and money to direct staff to engage an outside consultant to provide market research in conjunction with looking at other aspects of the Main Street Plan, including preservation of the proposed historic district.
Councilwoman Fillmore made a motion to direct the City Manager to schedule a work session to determine the scope of work for the City and an independent consultant regarding the South Main Street Corridor Plan. Councilman Wright seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0). Mr. Snyder said he will work with the developer to improve the existing project as much as possible.
At 8:43 p.m. the Council took a break, returning at 8:56 p.m.
City Attorney Romney briefed the Council on Federal and State regulations regarding sign ordinances, and advised that the most defensible ordinances deal with time, place, and manner restrictions, avoiding regulation of content. The Council discussed setbacks and size allowances, focusing on campaign signs. Councilman Wright asked if the City could have separate allowances for campaign signs during elections. Ms. Romney responded that singling out campaign signs would be regulating content and is not advisable. She reported on sign regulations in neighboring cities. The Council discussed existing enforcement regulations with staff. Councilwoman Fillmore suggested reducing setbacks, and allowing signs on property-line fences as long as safety is not compromised. Councilman Wright said he has a problem with limiting the number of campaign signs allowed on commercial property.
Councilwoman Fillmore made a motion to request that the Planning Commission revisit the sign ordinance with the following guidelines: change the residential and multi-tenant size allowance from 12 square-feet to 16 square-feet; remove the limit on the number of signs allowed on commercial property with an allowance of 50 square-feet; remove setbacks on residential property, and reduce setbacks to three feet on commercial property; and increase the three-foot height limit to four feet and the four-foot height limit to five feet. Councilwoman Ivie seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).
CAMPAIGN FINANCE ORDINANCE
Councilwoman Fillmore made a motion to repeal the City Code regarding Campaign Finance and accept the State Code as the City Campaign Finance Ordinance. Councilman Averett seconded the motion. Ms. Romney explained Legislative changes regarding campaign contribution reporting. Councilman Wright made a motion to amend the motion to direct staff to prepare an ordinance that would repeal the City’s current Campaign Finance Ordinance and adopt the State Code. Councilwoman Ivie stated that it matters to her who candidates are funded by, and said she would like the City to require disclosure prior to the primary election. Councilman Averett seconded Councilman Wright’s motion to amend the motion. The amended motion passed by majority vote (4-1), with Councilwoman Ivie dissenting. Staff agreed to prepare an ordinance repealing Section 2-03-110 of the City Ordinances to bring back to the Council for consideration at their next meeting.
PROPOSED COMPLETE STREETS POLICY/FINANCIAL REPORT/AMEND FY 2015 BUDGET
Councilman Wright made a motion to table discussion of the proposed Complete Streets Policy, the Financial Report, and the FY 2015 Budget Amendments to the next Council meeting. Mayor Cutler explained that the bid for re-roofing City Hall and the bid for the 2015 Street Overlay Project cannot be awarded until the FY 2015 Budget is amended. Councilman Averett seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).
SUMMARY ACTION CALENDAR
a. Award bid for re-roofing City Hall
Items (a) and (b) on the Summary Action Calendar cannot be approved until the FY 2015 Budget is amended. Councilman Wright made amotion to approve items (c), (d), and (e) on the Summary Action Calendar. Councilman Higginson seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).
• Mayor Cutler provided UTOPIA financial reports, and reported on discussions regarding creation of an independent taxing district for the South Davis Metro Fire Agency. Councilman Wright stated he is opposed to an independent taxing district, and he is aware of a group in Centerville that will call for a referendum if action is taken to increase taxes. Councilman Wright said he believes there are other ways to get an improved fire station for the City. Councilman Higginson said he feels there is a loss of oversight with taxing districts. Council members Higginson and Ivie indicated they would be more inclined to approve creation of an independent taxing district if approval of each individual city council were required to increase taxes.
Councilman Wright informed the Mayor that he is aware of a citizen interested in appointment to the Whitaker Museum Board.
At 9:59 p.m. Councilwoman Fillmore made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Councilman Wright seconded the motion, which passed by unanimous vote (5-0).